MANILA, Philippines – Sen. Panfilo Lacson on Saturday warned that senators, along with members of the House of Representatives, may be complicit in the ongoing controversy involving anomalous and ghost flood control projects, reiterating his call for complete transparency in the national budgeting process.
Lacson said on radio that lawmakers from both chambers routinely propose budget amendments or "insertions"—a practice that, while technically legal, can be exploited to channel funds into questionable infrastructure projects.
“I’m not saying it’s only House members,” Lacson said in Filipino. “It’s possible that some senators have inserted funding for such projects and even profited from the 25 percent share typically given to the ‘funder’ or proponent.”
Lacson: Senators not exempt from scrutiny in ghost flood control project scandal, This news data comes from:http://jyxingfa.com

Pressed further on whether senators might be tied to these fraudulent schemes, the senator replied, “There may be senators and House members who are connected to anomalous flood control projects.”
Lacson, a long-time advocate for budget transparency, refrained from naming specific individuals, stressing the importance of solid evidence. “It’s not right to name names without proof,” he said. “In my case, I only make findings public once they are backed by factual and verifiable information.”
- Comelec to open nearly two-year overseas voter registration for 2028 elections
- Heavy rain causes flooding, landslides and 8 deaths in Vietnam and Thailand
- Pope Leo XIV to Israeli president: 2-state solution needed to end Gaza war
- Thailand ruling party moves to dissolve parliament
- Australia's mushroom murderer faces victims' family in court
- DMW: 19 distressed OFWs return home from Jeddah
- Pagasa: Rainy Monday over Visayas, Luzon areas due to LPA, 'habagat'
- Some areas in Metro Manila, Bulacan to have brownouts due to maintenance work
- Indonesia, US and allies launch joint military drills
- 15 drug war victims cleared to join Duterte's ICC case